To cut or not to cut?
The debate has been going on for years with no conclusive answer. In many
cultures, circumcision is done for religious reasons rather than medical benefits. According to an
estimation, about one third of world’s male population is circumcised making it the most widely
performed surgical procedure without any medical indications. As per World Health Organization,
about 30 to 33% of world male population aged 15 and above is circumcised.
However, some people consider it to be unnecessary genital mutilation. A huge number of male
adults feels violated and unhappy because of procedure performed on them without their consent
when they were still an infant. Now the question arises whether the benefits of circumcision
outweighs its negative effects? Before we dive into that, let’s have a look on what exactly
Many studies suggest that circumcision reduces the risk of urinary tract infections in boys under two
years of age by a factor of 3 to 10 times. The 2012 Technical Report of the American Academy of
Paediatrics Task Force provides a reasonable scientific explanation on how circumcision does that.
According to the report, the urethra or the orifice at the tip of the penis harbours more bacteria that
cause UTI in uncircumcised boys than that of circumcised ones, especially in infants under 6 months.
Hence, circumcision reduces the risk of UTIs by reducing the population of these bacteria.
According to another report, “Childhood or adolescent circumcision is associated with a reduced risk
of invasive squamous-cell carcinoma.” Studies have also suggested that the procedure is protective
against penile cancer in men and cervical cancer in women who they copulate with. However,
another report suggests an association between circumcision and increased risk of invasive penile
carcinoma. There may be some discrepancy in the results as the procedure is thought to be opted by
male adults in an attempt to cure their penile cancer, hence not cause by circumcision itself.
Research also suggests circumcision is protective against STDs/STIs which is a highly sought after
medical benefit of circumcision. Studies carried out on circumcised and uncircumcised African males
showed that the prevalence of AIDS was three times greater in uncircumcised males than their
circumcised counterparts. Other studies have shown greater incidence of other STIs too such as
syphilis in uncircumcised males.
The plausible explanation behind greater risk of STIs/STDs in uncircumcised males is that during
intercourse, the delicate foreskin of uncircumcised males is more likely to sustain tiny cuts which
allows the HIV to access blood vessels and enter the blood stream causing the disease.
Circumcision also serves as a treatment of phimosis which is a condition prohibiting the foreskin to
retract over the head of penis making the intercourse painful and even impossible.
Another notable disadvantage of circumcision is reduction in sexual pleasure both due to
masturbation and intercourse as a study published in British Journal of Urology International
Just like any other surgical procedure, certain risks are associated with circumcision such as
excessive bleeding, pain, infection, increased risk of inflammation of orifice at the tip of the penis
etc. Although very little, there is a chance of major damage to the penis, having serious physical and
psychological implications. Circumcision trauma is also real and many adult males seek therapy for
that as they consider it genital mutilation performed against their will. Removing foreskin sometimes
also results into deformed erections that can severely affect the self-esteem.
The Rates Are Declining!
The American Academy of Paediatrics does not recommend circumcision as a routine procedure for
a new born as new studies are pouring in nullifying the previously thought benefits of circumcision.
In the recent years, the number of male population going for circumcision, voluntarily or
involuntarily, is declining, especially in modern world.
It is recommended to educate the parents and provide them valid information backed by science
before they make a decision. Since the decision still resides in the hands of parents, the least they
can do is ensure if the surgeon they are opting for is experienced. They should also ensure that their
infant is getting suitable local anaesthetic to block or at least reduce the sensation of pain.